Sex in the Trials in Tainted Space universe has consequences and pregnancy is one of them. Captain Steele is able to become pregnant, be impregnated (and inseminate and impregnate others), in a variety of ways, possibly giving birth in several ways as well. Dorf is vice dean and professor of law at Columbia University, where he teaches civil procedure and constitutional law. He is the co-author, with Laurence H. Tribe, of the book 'On.

Free Republic
Browse · Search

News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

US bishops endorse abortion-tainted COVID vaccine: ‘an act of love of our neighbor’
lifesitenews ^ | 12/15/2020 | David McLoone Space

Posted on 12/15/2020 10:47:54 PM PST by xomething

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first1-20 Trials

, 21-31nextlast

1posted on 12/15/2020 10:47:54 PM PSTby xomething

To: xomething

Well, all except for that one neighbor you murdered to make it. Guess it’s cool not to love them.

2posted on 12/15/2020 10:52:18 PM PSTby DesertRhino(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .. )

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Tainted cells?

3posted on 12/15/2020 11:04:01 PM PSTby yldstrk(Bingo! We have a winner!)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

No one was murdered to make either vaccine.

First, neither Moderna nor Pfizer used fetal stem cells in the R&D for their vaccines. http://phillycatholiclife.org/life-affirming-choices-3/covid-19-vaccines-explained/ and https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2020/11/use-of-pfizer-moderna-covid-19-vaccines-is-morally-acceptable-say-bishops/

What DID happen was some after-the-fact confirmation testing. But at no point during the research, development, or production of the vaccines were fetal stem cells used in any way.

Second, none of the vaccines required anyone to be murdered in order to produce them. The HEK-293 fetal stem cell line originates from an elective abortion that took place in 1973. The abortion was performed because the mother chose to do it; not because anyone forced her to do so, nor because anyone wanted stem cells. It was just one of the many, many unfortunate abortions that took place that year and the stem cells were taken after it was done. Nobody had heard of COVID-19 in 1973. Nobody forced the mother to have the abortion. “Neighbor you murdered to make it” is absurd even for the vaccines that actually used fetal stem cells in their R&D, and that’s coming from someone who DOES agree there’s a moral problem with using them. We have other, more ethical methods of developing medicines and vaccines. They’re a little less efficient, but frankly, tough.

4posted on 12/15/2020 11:06:00 PM PSTby 2aProtectsTheRest(The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Exactly. Can’t let facts get in the way of an agenda. Even if I agree with the agenda doesn’t make it right to misrepresent reality.

5posted on 12/15/2020 11:38:03 PM PSTby newzjunkey(Purdue in GA for the Senate - Vote Giant Meteor in 2020)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Why are so many pushing this vaccine? Something is not right. There is much more to this story. This “flu” has a 99% survival rate for healthy people, maybe even better than that. Something is not right.

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Yea old common good argument. Funny how they dont accept the left’s common good argument for abortion. You know. the safety of a child born to a poor mom, a depressed mom, a mom with an abusive husband.
Mustcbe the money.

7posted on 12/15/2020 11:47:46 PM PSTby momincombatboots(Ephesians 6.. who you are really at war with)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

There are people who would love to inject their toxins into everyone.

8posted on 12/16/2020 12:06:14 AM PSTby Arcadian Empire

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

9posted on 12/16/2020 1:10:38 AM PSTby ButThreeLeftsDo(MAGA!!!)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Infection Fatality Rate for COVID-19 is 0.65%. With an R0 of 2.5, that’s 60% before we reach the Herd Immunity Threshold. Everything doesn’t magically stop when we hit that number, but that’s the beginning of the inexorable decline of infections due to lack of available vulnerable hosts. In the US, with our population of 330 million, that’s 198 million just to reach HIT. 0.65% of 198 million is ~1.3 million.

Nobody should want to see 1.3 million dead Americans. THAT is why people are pushing the vaccines. The two in the approval phase - Pfizer and Moderna - have been proven safe and effective with the same process used to approve every other drug and vaccine on the market.

10posted on 12/16/2020 1:23:31 AM PSTby 2aProtectsTheRest(The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

'The two in the approval phase - Pfizer and Moderna - have been proven safe and effective with the same process used to approve every other drug and vaccine on the market.'

Similar process but shrunken down timewise by a factor of about ten, including testing. Sound safe to you?

11posted on 12/16/2020 1:35:38 AM PSTby steve86(Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))

[Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

'Similar process but shrunken down timewise by a factor of about ten, including testing. Sound safe to you?'

The development of the vaccine candidates was not unusually short for this point in time. In the 1950s it took 10+ years to develop a viable vaccine candidate for testing. By the 1990s it was down to 5 years. 2 years for SARS2003. 7 months for Zika in 2014. 6 months for Ebola in 2016. So 2 months for SARS-CoV-2 in 2020 is not the least bit unreasonable. It's not even unexpected. Behringer x32 rack software mac. It's a gradual, logical progression build on a firm base of knowledge and experience with new technology and scientific advances streamlining processes.

As for the testing, there are multiple pathways for accelerated review and approval for new drugs and vaccines where appropriate. President Trump declared it was appropriate to use the various quicker options for review and approval. Here is an article from 2018 (long before anyone heard of COVID-19) discussing the options and their associated timelines.

Again, nothing unusual about any of this. Anyone who tells you these were rushed is probably a Democrat, or at least is parroting nonsense talking points from Democrats like Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Governor Cuomo, and Governor Newsom. They've all claimed President Trump rushed the vaccines and they're dangerous. Louis Farrakhan claimed the vaccines are unsafe as well.

So you can be on the side of President Trump - who championed these vaccines and oversaw the process - or you can be on the side of Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Andrew Cuomo, and Louis Farrakhan in claiming these vaccines were rushed and are dangerous. So which is it?

12posted on 12/16/2020 1:50:48 AM PSTby 2aProtectsTheRest(The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)

Trials In Tainted Space Abortion